Rotman International Trading Competition – Scoring – Day 2 – BMO Financial Group Finance Research and Trading Lab

RITC 2025 | 21st Edition

Scoring

Team	Case 1	Case 2	Case 3	Case 4	Case 5	Final Rank
University of Calgary	9	2	4	2	2	1
Baruch College	3	1	10	1	5	2
University of Warsaw	17	2	6	5	8	3
Chulalongkorn University	2	9	8	6	9	4
Laval University	1	5	28	7	3	5
Luiss Guido Carli University of Rome	18	4	18	3	4	6
Babson College	7	10	13	10	7	7
City University of Hong Kong	21	6	3	9	15	8
University College Dublin	5	11	5	26	12	9
Carnegie Mellon University	27	19	1	12	6	10
Cambridge University Algorithmic Trading Society	19	17	7	29	1	11
Trinity College Dublin	10	22	20	14	11	12
University of Economics in Bratislava	4	15	11	33	16	13
Reykjavik University	20	16	22	11	13	14
Fairfield University	16	7	21	17	23	15
University of Waterloo	12	14	14	32	17	16
Oklahoma State University	31	12	29	20	10	17
Boston University	15	21	2	23	26	18
University of Toronto	6	13	33	4	32	19
University of Ottawa	22	8	16	13	33	20
Mohammed Bin Zayed University of Artificial Intelligence	13	23	9	18	29	21
Columbia University	34	26	23	8	14	22
University of Windsor	8	20	31	25	21	23
Northern Alberta Institute of Technology (NAIT)	14	32	19	19	19	24
Concordia University	23	24	15	28	20	25
NYU Tandon School of Engineering	25	18	26	24	24	26
Rutgers University	11	29	32	15	25	27
University of British Columbia Trading Group	32	27	34	27	18	28
Queen’s University	24	33	12	34	28	29
Toronto Metropolitan University	35	25	30	31	22	30
University of Alberta	33	31	25	22	27	31
University of Minnesota	28	35	24	16	31	32
Monash University	26	30	27	30	30	33
University of Nevada	29	28	17	35	34	34
Saint Mary’s University	30	34	35	21	35	35

Case 1: Mergers and Acquisition Case

Case 2: Commodities Trading Case

Case 3: Sales and Trader Case

Case 4: Algo CAPM Forecasting Case

Case 5: Algo Quant Arbitrage Trading Case

The final ranking is determined not only by the weighted average of ranks across all cases but also by the variance in performance. This approach ensures a fair and accurate assessment of team performance.

Individual Case Heat Ranking

Case 1: Mergers and Acquisition Case

Team	Heat 1	Heat 2	Heat 3	Heat 4	Heat 5	Heat 6	Heat 7	Heat 8	Final Rank
Laval University	1	2	28	2	11	14	6	7	1
Chulalongkorn University	12	16	23	1	5	13	1	3	2
Baruch College	2	1	25	8	12	7	13	11	3
University of Economics in Bratislava	5	3	29	14	14	1	8	5	4
University College Dublin	17	6	31	10	20	3	2	1	5
University of Toronto	3	9	26	9	18	9	11	8	6
Babson College	11	17	17	4	7	18	10	10	7
University of Windsor	4	10	32	5	13	11	18	9	8
University of Calgary	8	18	6	22	4	17	24	4	9
Trinity College Dublin	6	5	22	17	25	8	17	6	10
Rutgers University	19	8	10	7	15	10	4	33	11
University of Waterloo	10	12	18	6	6	15	12	28	12
Mohammed Bin Zayed University of Artificial Intelligence	13	22	5	3	10	12	16	26	13
Northern Alberta Institute of Technology (NAIT)	23	4	34	19	16	6	5	2	14
Boston University	31	27	4	21	2	4	7	30	15
Fairfield University	20	19	35	18	17	2	3	14	16
University of Warsaw	9	14	11	12	3	19	32	31	17
Luiss Guido Carli University of Rome	15	7	15	26	1	29	31	15	18
Cambridge University Algorithmic Trading Society	16	24	13	13	23	5	22	27	19
Reykjavik University	14	15	14	24	8	25	26	20	20
City University of Hong Kong	7	11	33	20	9	16	19	32	21
University of Ottawa	24	13	30	11	24	26	14	13	22
Concordia University	21	23	24	23	19	21	15	24	23
Queen’s University	27	21	7	15	27	33	21	23	24
NYU Tandon School of Engineering	18	20	8	34	21	28	33	12	25
Monash University	29	32	1	27	29	23	28	16	26
Carnegie Mellon University	34	34	12	29	26	27	9	17	27
University of Minnesota	25	25	27	16	22	22	30	25	28
University of Nevada	26	26	16	33	30	34	20	18	29
Saint Mary’s University	22	30	9	25	34	24	27	35	30
Oklahoma State University	28	33	2	30	33	31	34	21	31
University of British Columbia	35	35	21	35	28	20	23	22	32
University of Alberta	32	29	3	32	31	35	35	29	33
Columbia University	33	31	20	31	32	32	29	19	34
Toronto Metropolitan University	30	28	19	28	35	30	25	34	35

Individual Case Heat Ranking

Case 2: Commodities Trading Case

Team	Heat 1	Heat 2	Heat 3	Heat 4	Heat 5	Final Rank
Baruch College	1	2	3	1	1	1
University of Warsaw	2	3	1	2	4	2
University of Calgary	3	1	2	4	2	2
Luiss Guido Carli University of Rome	6	4	4	6	5	4
Laval University	4	7	6	3	6	5
City University of Hong Kong	5	5	9	12	3	6
Fairfield University	7	10	8	11	7	7
University of Ottawa	12	8	7	8	11	8
Chulalongkorn University	9	9	12	7	13	9
Babson College	8	6	5	23	14	10
University College Dublin	13	12	14	5	19	11
Oklahoma State University	14	15	10	18	16	12
University of Toronto	21	11	13	20	8	13
University of Waterloo	11	20	11	9	22	14
University of Economics in Bratislava	16	13	16	13	17	15
Reykjavik University	15	14	15	21	10	16
Cambridge University Algorithmic Trading Society	10	16	19	15	18	17
NYU Tandon School of Engineering	19	19	18	14	15	18
Carnegie Mellon University	18	18	22	17	12	19
University of Windsor	24	28	17	16	9	20
Boston University	20	17	21	22	25	21
Trinity College Dublin	17	23	26	10	30	22
Mohammed Bin Zayed University of Artificial Intelligence	25	26	20	24	21	23
Concordia University	23	22	25	30	20	24
Toronto Metropolitan University	22	30	27	19	24	25
Columbia University	32	25	24	28	23	26
University of British Columbia Trading Group	30	33	23	25	27	27
University of Nevada	29	21	28	34	26	28
Rutgers University	26	24	34	27	34	29
Monash University	27	32	29	26	32	30
University of Alberta	28	31	30	29	31	31
Northern Alberta Institute of Technology (NAIT)	31	27	31	32	29	32
Queen’s University	33	29	32	31	28	33
Saint Mary’s University	35	35	33	33	33	34
University of Minnesota	34	34	35	35	35	35

Individual Case Heat Ranking

Case 3: Sales and Trader Case

Team	Rank1	Rank2	Rank3	Rank4	Rank5	Rank6	Rank7	Rank8	Final Rank
Carnegie Mellon University	3	2	2	7	6	1	1	8	1
Boston University	14	3	1	1	3	2	3	3	2
City University of Hong Kong	4	1	16	5	12	7	13	1	3
University of Calgary	5	10	8	8	1	9	17	6	4
University College Dublin	6	14	5	3	14	12	10	4	5
University of Warsaw	16	4	6	15	2	11	14	2	6
Cambridge University Algorithmic Trading Society	10	5	17	10	10	3	4	14	7
Chulalongkorn University	7	11	12	9	4	4	5	24	8
Mohammed Bin Zayed University of Artificial Intelligence	8	8	3	12	9	8	6	25	9
Baruch College	9	13	13	13	20	14	7	13	10
University of Economics in Bratislava	13	15	10	21	11	15	2	18	11
Queen’s University	33	7	4	35	5	5	33	5	12
Babson College	17	25	11	14	21	10	24	9	13
University of Waterloo	19	30	7	16	7	17	15	22	14
Concordia University	11	26	9	30	13	6	9	30	15
University of Ottawa	23	6	18	19	15	20	18	16	16
University of Nevada	1	12	23	11	32	19	23	20	17
Luiss Guido Carli University of Rome	18	17	27	26	18	18	11	7	18
Northern Alberta Institute of Technology (NAIT)	24	31	28	4	8	21	8	21	19
Trinity College Dublin	28	21	15	28	17	13	21	17	20
Fairfield University	21	19	19	6	25	27	28	15	21
Reykjavik University	20	16	20	23	16	22	22	29	22
Columbia University	15	28	14	25	30	34	20	12	23
University of Minnesota	2	22	22	2	29	35	35	34	24
University of Alberta	29	9	34	31	34	23	12	10	25
NYU Tandon School of Engineering	32	18	25	29	19	25	25	19	26
Monash University	12	29	30	22	22	28	29	26	27
Laval University	26	20	24	24	26	30	26	23	28
Oklahoma State University	22	33	29	17	24	16	31	31	29
Toronto Metropolitan University	34	27	31	32	23	31	19	11	30
University of Windsor	27	23	21	27	31	32	32	28	31
Rutgers University	31	24	26	33	27	24	30	27	32
University of Toronto	25	34	32	20	28	33	27	35	33
University of British Columbia Trading Group	30	32	35	18	33	29	34	33	34
Saint Mary’s University	35	35	33	34	35	26	16	32	35

Individual Case Heat Ranking

Case 4: Algo CAPM Forecasting Case

Team	Rank1	Rank2	Rank3	Rank4	Rank5	Rank6	Rank7	Rank8	Final Rank
Baruch College	1	3	7	1	1	8	10	1	1
University of Calgary	7	11	2	3	5	2	2	6	2
Luiss Guido Carli University of Rome	4	8	6	6	4	3	5	5	3
University of Toronto	5	5	5	4	8	5	9	4	4
University of Warsaw	12	12	20	2	2	1	1	2	5
Chulalongkorn University	2	7	8	7	12	7	6	9	6
Laval University	3	16	1	5	10	9	8	8	7
Columbia University	10	10	9	21	11	4	3	11	8
City University of Hong Kong	6	6	3	10	29	16	11	3	9
Babson College	9	9	4	8	9	17	15	15	10
Reykjavik University	16	2	21	16	6	15	13	7	11
Carnegie Mellon University	8	14	16	11	7	18	17	19	12
University of Ottawa	31	1	11	17	23	14	16	12	13
Trinity College Dublin	22	13	13	18	24	12	14	13	14
Rutgers University	23	23	14	14	16	19	18	10	15
University of Minnesota	19	17	28	30	3	10	7	23	16
Fairfield University	15	21	17	15	15	21	23	17	17
Mohammed Bin Zayed University of Artificial Intelligence	14	18	19	29	14	11	28	22	18
Northern Alberta Institute of Technology (NAIT)	29	26	15	22	18	13	12	27	19
Oklahoma State University	24	27	12	9	33	29	4	31	20
Saint Mary’s University	11	4	26	31	28	28	32	14	21
University of Alberta	18	24	22	25	22	23	21	25	22
Boston University	21	19	29	28	20	20	19	28	23
NYU Tandon School of Engineering	20	25	25	24	21	24	22	26	24
University of Windsor	26	20	18	23	31	22	25	24	25
University College Dublin	27	30	24	13	17	31	30	21	26
University of British Columbia Trading Group	17	35	35	19	26	25	24	16	27
Concordia University	13	22	27	12	32	27	31	33	28
Cambridge University Algorithmic Trading Society	35	28	10	33	27	6	29	30	29
Monash University	25	29	23	26	19	34	27	29	30
Toronto Metropolitan University	30	15	35	35	13	34	20	32	31
University of Waterloo	28	31	32	20	30	30	26	20	32
University of Economics in Bratislava	35	35	30	27	25	26	33	18	33
Queen’s University	32	32	31	32	34	34	35	35	34
University of Nevada	35	35	35	35	36	34	35	35	35

Individual Case Heat Ranking

Case 5: Algo Quantitative Arbitrage Trading Case

Team	Rank1	Rank2	Rank3	Rank4	Rank5	Rank6	Rank7	Rank8	Final Rank
Cambridge University Algorithmic Trading Society	1	1	2	5	1	3	8	1	1
University of Calgary	3	3	1	2	6	5	6	5	2
Laval University	6	2	3	3	5	1	1	11	3
Luiss Guido Carli University of Rome	7	7	6	12	8	2	3	4	4
Baruch College	2	4	5	6	2	9	21	2	5
Carnegie Mellon University	5	10	9	15	7	6	5	7	6
Babson College	9	9	8	13	14	4	4	10	7
University of Warsaw	17	8	4	11	15	7	7	6	8
Chulalongkorn University	10	21	10	7	12	8	11	13	9
Oklahoma State University	8	15	13	14	16	10	9	12	10
Trinity College Dublin	4	11	7	9	13	12	18	27	11
University College Dublin	32	6	18	10	11	11	14	26	12
Reykjavik University	15	26	11	17	20	14	16	17	13
Columbia University	11	13	23	32	4	21	27	9	14
City University of Hong Kong	13	23	25	8	24	17	13	20	15
University of Economics in Bratislava	16	17	20	23	21	16	19	14	16
University of Waterloo	12	16	16	20	23	18	24	18	17
University of British Columbia Trading Group	14	25	24	21	32	13	15	8	18
Northern Alberta Institute of Technology (NAIT)	34	35	14	19	9	15	12	15	19
Concordia University	27	30	12	4	30	22	31	3	20
University of Windsor	19	19	22	25	17	19	26	21	21
Toronto Metropolitan University	20	27	27	30	19	20	17	16	22
Fairfield University	21	18	21	28	22	23	23	24	23
NYU Tandon School of Engineering	18	14	26	24	10	28	29	31	24
Rutgers University	24	22	19	31	25	24	20	23	25
Boston University	29	12	32	18	31	25	10	30	26
University of Alberta	22	20	28	27	18	31	28	29	27
Queen’s University	35	5	34	33	34	34	2	28	28
Mohammed Bin Zayed University of Artificial Intelligence	23	29	31	26	29	26	22	25	29
Monash University	28	28	29	29	27	27	25	22	30
University of Minnesota	25	31	17	34	3	35	32	35	31
University of Toronto	33	32	15	16	26	33	30	33	32
University of Ottawa	31	33	30	22	33	29	35	19	33
University of Nevada	30	34	35	1	35	30	34	34	34
Saint Mary’s University	26	24	33	35	28	32	33	32	35

Final Scoring

The final case scores are calculated by first multiplying the final ranks from each case by their assigned case weights to generate a final weighted mean score. This weighted score determines the overall ranking, with the highest score being the best. Additionally, the Weighted Mean-Variance Score is used as a key factor in determining final rankings, particularly for the top three positions and in cases of a tie. This approach ensures that the best-performing teams are recognized based on both consistency and overall performance across all RITC cases. By applying the Weighted Mean-Variance method, we ensure a fair ranking process that rewards teams maintaining high and stable performance throughout the competition. This methodology is also used in our academic programs and other competitions as a reliable metric for evaluating student performance. Over time, it has proven to be one of the most effective approaches for assessing both consistency and overall achievement, making it a fair and credible ranking method for RITC.

While we share the ranking methodology, providing a detailed breakdown of the individual scoring process on the scoring page may not be feasible. Ranking determines the relative standing of teams, while the Weighted Mean-Variance scoring method assigns points based on specific performance metrics. These two processes may differ in methodology, but together they ensure a fair and accurate ranking for the competition. We appreciate your understanding and respect for the established evaluation criteria, which are designed to maintain fairness and consistency for all participating teams.

RITC 2025 | 21st Edition

Scoring

Individual Case Heat Ranking

Individual Case Heat Ranking

Individual Case Heat Ranking

Individual Case Heat Ranking

Individual Case Heat Ranking

Final Scoring

\\\

Location and operating hours

Latest News